Leo the cowardly lion

I'm sorry, it's stark raving mad.

It's the online personification of its author, "Brother" Nathanael, pictured at left. Nathanael calls himself a "street evangelist". I think that's a nice way of saying, he's a bit homeless himself. Being anti-Semitic is just his particular expression of his madness.

He's cuckoo. His website is nutty like a Snickers bar. It's moon-bat time over there.

Which is precisely why Leo Adler and the Simon Wiesenthal Center took it on. That raving lunatic is no threat to them -- politically, legally, or in any other way.

So here's my question for Leo the cowardly lion: why are you focusing on the harmless nuts, while ignoring the real anti-Semites in Canada, like the Canadian Islamic Congress?

I'm not for laws against hate speech, and I'm not for banning websites. But if I was -- like Leo is -- why isn't he going after the likes of the Jew-hating Mohamed Elmasry?

The answer is as obvious as the question. Elmasry isn't a powerless nut. He's a powerful, well-funded nut, with a battery of lawyers and even a smidgeon of media credibility. And, just as important in the world of grievance-mongers, Elmasry is a visible minority immigrant Muslim, which makes his bigotry politically bulletproof in the new "human rights" law.

So, you go, Leo. Take on "Brother" Nathanael, and put out your masturbatory press releases. Send out a few more fundraising letters, telling Jews that you've made the world safer, by making Nutbar Nathanael, uh, switch ISPs.

Leave fighting Mohamed Elmasry to Mark Steyn, Maclean's and me. We've got it covered -- and we don't even need a government grant, or the favour of a government censor, to do it.