Lunch time is over

Because it's now 1:40 p.m. PT. Of course, the Troika likes their 90-minute lunches so much, sometimes they go for two full hours. I ascribe it to the thrall my blog post has put them in. But the gallery is in their seats.

In the meantime, I'll post a letter I received from Kathy Shaidle, my co-defendant in one of my many HRC-related legal fights:

Soft bigotry of low expectations.

You're there and I'm not but:

I think that's what's motivating the HRC panel bending over backward to accommodate the poor underprivileged "Mohammedans" in their midst and  letting them get away with their every whim.

(All those in this particular case the "low expectations" have turned out to be quite justified!)

PS: I am totally writing and saying "Mohammedans" from now on... heh.

It's a good question. Would the BCHRT accept such shoddy lawyering from a WASP complainant's counsel? Would they be so indulgent? I don't know.

But I do know one thing. In a free society, when you seek to censor your critics rather than debate them, when you whine to a kangaroo court about the use of the word "Mohammedan", you can pretty much be guaranteed you're going to hear it a helluva lot more.

That's what Khurrum Awan and Faisal Joseph don't seem to understand: the hatred and contempt directed towards them is not because of Mark Steyn's article in Maclean's. It's because of their own graceless manner in responding to that article. They can expect to be mocked for a long, long time.