
Justice!
The Troika has rejected the admissability of the Op-Ed, because it doesn't have the poll's statistics in it. Lucky for Maclean's, the "expert" "Op-Ed" that appeared weeks before their article didn't have those details. Otherwise the Troika would have admitted it.
As what? Expert evidence? Surely not. Cross-examinable? Of course not. Relevant to a publication weeks later? Of course not.
Maclean's objection was sustained, but for the stupidest reason.
Hell, take 'em where you can get 'em, I guess.

