Awan the liar, part 6

Now Awan is listing authors he'd find acceptable for the rebuttal article they were demanding -- including Haroon Siddiqui, of the Toronto Star. Why the hell not? Just because they're competitors, no reason why you shouldn't try to force Siddiqui onto Maclean's.

But Porter points out that Awan did not mention Siddiqui's name, or any other.

Porter: why didn't you put those ideas to Whyte?

Awan: "Well we couldn't."  Uh, okay. So you had time to demand cash, and a cover story, but you "couldn't" have spoken the truth back then?

I don't even understand the excuse. But it's not meant to be understandable; it's not meant to clarify; it's meant to muddy, to confuse.

Let me sum up for you, dear reader, who are not here to watch a junion would-be lawyer try to explain to a court why he is a serial, malicious, money-grubbing liar.

Khurrum Awan went in demanding cash and editorial control. Then he realized that doesn't look good in a liberal democracy like Canada. So he edited the truth. He amended what he said. He lied.

And lied and lied and lied.

And kept lying.

He smeared Ken Whyte. He smeared Maclean's. He smeared Rogers. And that damn fool thought he'd get away with it. He was so brazen that he thought he'd even call himself as a witness.

Julian Porter has earned his fee today.