The nanny state

| | |

Canada's human rights commissions are a manifestation of the "nanny state" -- where the government treats citizens like children in need of nannying. That's what most HRC cases are about these days: salving hurt feelings, throwing a few extra dollars (or a few extra tens of thousands of dollars) to people who can frame life's normal ups and downs as some sort of political grievance.

Here is a column I wrote for last month's Canadian Lawyer about a different kind of nanny-statism run amok -- in the form of helmet laws for kids on sleighs. I wouldn't mind such laws in situations where the state really was in loco parentis -- in an orphanage, say, or even on a school field trip. But these laws replace parents and their judgement with the state.

Donate to fight the HRC


"This organization is not a registered non-profit organization.  Donations to this organization are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes."

Sign up for the mailing list

Name:

Email:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ezra Levant published on April 24, 2008 9:15 PM.

Thank you, Mark Steyn was the previous entry in this blog.

The best column yet on human rights commissions is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogrolls





Blogging Tories