Dona Cadman pulls the plug on Cadscam

| | |

Here's Dona Cadman's public statement on the allegations that the Prime Minister authorized a bribe of her late husband, Chuck. I think that each of the Cadmans has said and done some iffy things, frankly. Even according to the vanity biography commissioned by the Cadman family, Chuck's deliberations about that final, key vote make him look like someone who was more concerned with his own financial security, or the hassle of winning a party nomination or running an election campaign, or even the thrill of being at the center of attention (and the sheer excitement at having Paul Martin visit his apartment) than with voting on a Parliamentary bill according to some principle. But I think it's done, now.

Here's the statement:

March 3, 2008

Personal Statement by Dona Cadman

I'm a little bit surprised at the level of reaction to the disclosures in Tom Zytaruk's book and I guess that's probably because it was put to rest in my mind, when I discussed the matter with Stephen Harper, 2 ½ years ago. At that time, I recall specifically asking him if he was aware of a million dollar insurance policy offer, that upset Chuck so much.

He looked me straight in the eyes and told me he had no knowledge of an insurance policy offer. I knew he was telling me the truth; I could see it in his eyes. He said, yes he'd had some discussions with two individuals about asking Chuck to rejoin the party, but he'd told them they were wasting their time trying to convince Chuck.

From that point forward.... I didn't regard it as a "Party" initiative, but rather; the overzealous indiscretion of a couple of individuals.... whose identity, Chuck never revealed to me.

It all comes back to my conversation with the Prime Minister.... 2 ½ years ago. I want to be perfectly clear in that regard. Chuck liked, respected and trusted Stephen Harper. I like, respect and trust Stephen Harper. If I didn't believe in my heart, that he was telling me the truth.... I wouldn't be running as the Conservative Candidate for Surrey North.

Dona Cadman

I think that, between Dona's statement and Stephen Harper's defamation notice, the Liberals will probably drop this scandal-that-never-was. As Rick Mercer would say, they're backing down and loving it.

Donate to fight the HRC


"This organization is not a registered non-profit organization.  Donations to this organization are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes."

Sign up for the mailing list

Name:

Email:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ezra Levant published on March 3, 2008 2:11 PM.

Warman's Law was the previous entry in this blog.

Ontario needs a "Warman's Law" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogrolls





Blogging Tories