Canadian Association of Journalists

Hard on the heels of PEN Canada, the Canadian Association of Journalists issued a very clear statement today demanding amendments to human rights statutes, to stop their prosecution of thought crimes. I was going to excerpt from it, but it's all great -- I'll post the whole thing here:

CAJ urges changes to human rights laws

    OTTAWA, Feb. 22 /CNW/ - The Canadian Association of Journalists is

calling on federal and provincial governments to amend human rights

legislation to stop a pattern of disturbing attacks on freedom of speech.

    Two recent cases spotlight the dangers of allowing state-backed agencies

to censor speech based on subjective perceptions of offensiveness - MacLean's

magazine, which is facing complaints in two provinces and nationally for an

article by syndicated columnist Mark Steyn, and Ezra Levant, the former

publisher of the Western Standard who is now before the Alberta Human Rights

Commission for his decision to publish the Danish cartoons of the Islamic

prophet Muhammad.

    "Human rights commissions were never intended to act as a form of thought

police," said CAJ President Mary Agnes Welch. "But now they're being used to

chill freedom of expression on matters that are well beyond accepted Criminal

Code restrictions on free speech."

    The CAJ supports Liberal MP Keith Martin's private members motion to have

section 13(1) of federal human rights legislation, the clause dealing with

published material, repealed. Similar provincial legislation should also be

amended as required.

    "The lack of political leadership on this issue, apart from Mr. Martin

and a few others, is appalling," said Welch. "Even people who helped create

human rights commissions have said they were never meant to act as censors.

Since a number of commissions have accepted these complaints as worthy of

investigation, there clearly needs to be government direction to stop the

ongoing erosion of one of Canada's most fundamental rights."

    The CAJ believes that laws of libel and slander, hate speech and other

provisions found within the Criminal Code provide sufficient restrictions on

freedom of speech. Human rights commissions, which are not bound by the same

rules of evidence of the courts, have become last-ditch end-arounds for those

who want to silence commentary they disagree with.

    "Whether you agree with Steyn or Levant is immaterial. If they're

breaking no laws, they should have the right, in our democracy, to speak

freely," said Welch.

    The CAJ will be monitoring the investigations in these two cases and

plans to intervene if the process moves to the tribunal stage. The CAJ,

however, strongly urges the Canadian human rights commission, as well of those

of Alberta, B.C. and Ontario, to simply dismiss these complaints completely.

    The Canadian Association of Journalists is a professional organization

with some 1,500 members across Canada. The CAJ's primary role is to

provide-public interest advocacy and high quality professional development for

its members.

That's clear and forceful thinking; I've bolded a few of my favourite passages. I'm particularly impressed that the CAJ is promising to intervene on behalf of Steyn and me, should our cases go to a full tribunal hearing.

The CAJ has been good on this issue for a while; two years ago, they invited me to speak to their annual convention in Halifax about the Western Standard's decision to publish the cartoons. That showed courage in itself. The CAJ's past president, Paul Schneidereit, has written several great columns on the subject. And the new president, Mary Agnes Welch, is certainly no slouch either.

What a pleasant contrast the CAJ makes with the so-called Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, which is still hiding under their desks. They've made bold statements about press freedom in Tunisia, Guyana and Somalia, which is probably why they've been too busy to look out their own window.