And from the Globe...

| | |

Dr. Martin's motion is timely, even if it won't come to a vote in the foreseeable future. It arrives amid the gross overreaching of human-rights commissions in hearing two high-profile cases involving journalists Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant, both of which are best viewed as nuisance complaints. But even those whose views are indisputably, irredeemably offensive - the white supremacists who have praised Dr. Martin's motion, or anti-Semitic former aboriginal leader David Ahenakew - should not be muzzled by well-meaning government agencies.

:::

Liberal Leader Stephane Dion has asked Dr. Martin to voluntarily withdraw it. He should do no such thing. Even if his motion is doomed, it is encouraging to see at least one of this country's elected representatives stand up for a key tenet of democracy.

Donate to fight the HRC


"This organization is not a registered non-profit organization.  Donations to this organization are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes."

Sign up for the mailing list

Name:

Email:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ezra Levant published on February 6, 2008 6:47 AM.

Two great Op-Eds in the Post was the previous entry in this blog.

Canadian Human Rights Act doesn't apply to Indians is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogrolls





Blogging Tories